- BlestWithSons
Are you a fan of Daylight Savings Time? If so, please leave in the comments why we need this abominable Governmental tinkering with the time. Personally, I'm agin it.
So's John J. Miller:
Well, it turns out that DST had nothing to do with farmers, who traditionally haven't cared much for it. They care a lot less nowadays, but when the first DST law was making its way through Congress, farmers actually lobbied against it. Dairy farmers were especially upset because their cows refused to accept humanity's tinkering with the hands of time. The obstinate cud-chewers wanted to be milked every twelve hours, and had absolutely no interest in resetting their biological clocks—even if the local creameries suddenly wanted their milk an hour earlier.
As Michael Downing points out in his new book, Spring Forward: The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time, urban businessmen were a major force behind the adoption of DST in the United States. They thought daylight would encourage workers to go shopping on their way home. They also tried to make a case for agriculture, though they didn't bother to consult any actual farmers. One pamphlet argued that DST would benefit the men and women who worked the land because "most farm products are better when gathered with dew on. They are firmer, crisper, than if the sun has dried the dew off." At least that was the claim of the Boston Chamber of Commerce, chaired by department-store magnate A. Lincoln Filene. This was utter nonsense. A lot of crops couldn't be harvested until the morning dew had evaporated. What's more, morning dew has no effect whatsoever on firmness or crispness.
. . .
We're also informed that DST helps conserve energy, apparently because people arriving home when the sun is still up don't switch on their lights. Didn't it occur to anybody that maybe they compensate by switching them on earlier in the morning? Moreover, people who arrive home from work an hour earlier during the hot summer months are probably more prone to turning up their air conditioners. According to Downing, the petroleum industry once was "an ardent and generous supporter" of DST because it believed people would hop in their cars and drive for pleasure—and guzzle more gas.
But the very worst thing about DST is that it's bad for your health. According to Stanley Coren, a sleep expert at the University of British Columbia, the number of traffic accidents and fatal industrial mishaps increase on the Monday after we spring forward. (Check out one of his studies here.) The reason, presumably, is because losing even a single hour of sleep over the weekend makes a lot of people a bit drowsier on what we might usefully call Black Monday. Unfortunately, there's no compensating effect of a super-safe Monday as we go off DST and "fall back" in the autumn.
So DST is deadly. But maybe we should keep that troubling little fact to ourselves, before Congress decides to impose the National Bedtime Hour.
Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/5293.
I feel like I have to reset the time on the clock in my living room every week. It's annoying.

I would hate DST a lot, except I so love the extra hour of sleep each Autumn - it's one of the reasons that Fall is my favorite season.
I know this is stupid - amuse me.
There's nothing like anticipating that extra hour of time - you can do whatever you want with it! If you want extra sleep, you can take it. If you want to stay up and watch all of SNL, you can do that. If you want to go hang out with friends and stay up later without guilt cause you can still make it to church on time - go for it!
It's WORTH giving up an hour in stupid Spring. Who likes Spring? Overly-romantic people and baseball nerds - that's who. Spring deserves to be taken away from. Spring is too rich with its growth and prosperity. Autumn doesn't have as much - it's practically dying!!! Who better than the government to reapportion what properly belongs to one Season and give it to another, less fortunate Season? IT'S SOCIAL JUSTICE! In fact, maybe we ought to take TWO hours away from Spring and an hour away from Summer, too - I live in Texas where Summer is horrible. We'd all feel better if it were more dark in the daytime so it could be in the 90s instead of the 100s. WEATHER SOCIALISM!!!
Thank God for a government that has the guts to take over what it knows a little about (mother nature) and doing us all a big favor by creating laws and norms around its interference in what could be a disaster. Losing my extra hour of sleep would be enough to make me riot. THAT'S RIGHT - RIOT. Me and all of my teenager friends are gonna take to the streets if you take this away from us. WE DESERVE WHAT'S RIGHTFULLY HOURS.
Quaid,
Awesome comment.
That said,
I'm against switching back and forth also. It's ridiculous. (And my kids had a really hard time getting up this morning. Not their fault.) Yes, they went to bed "on time" but they couldn't go to sleep because their internal clocks hadn't adjusted yet.)
But I like the extra hour of daylight, so here's what I propose: Why not leave it on the "summer time" year round? and never change it again? Who says that real time has to get darker sooner? I'm for the "extra hour of daylight". Just leave it there.
So Bill, I'm with you in opposition to switching. But I vote that the time we keep is the more daylight in the evening one.
Richard, Hawaii also doesn't observe DST in addition to Arizona. Most of Indiana also didn't use to, but in 2006 they gave in and now do.
As a kid, I grew up in the northwestern edge of the central time zone. It didn't get dark until 10:30pm at night. I hated having to go to bed when it was still light out. Always felt like you were being cheated out of summer. I also delivered newspapers in the morning, and DST made that job worse in spring when you had to start when it was dark and colder. I'd have really hated this early March start to DST.
But now as an adult living in a southern state, I actually have to say that I like DST. Being further south means the daylight extremes are less anyway, I am on the eastern edge of the time zone where DST seems to fit better, I don't have a job that requires me to get up at 5:30am anymore, plus I am more of an evening than a morning person.
So I think the desire to have the extra hour of daylight in the morning versus the evening depends alot on where you live and what kind of job you have. But I do agree the switching back and forth really should end. Pick one time and stick with it.
By the way, I still remember the payroll problems we had at a factory where I worked that ran 24/7 during the DST switch. In the fall, the workers rightfully expected and received the extra hour of pay since they had to work an extra hour when the clocks were moved back. However, in the sping, there were always some who felt they were being cheated when we didn't pay them for their 'lost' DST hour. Not to mention all the time clock adjustments that had to be made to make it work out properly.
Oh and another thing,
It affects church attendance!!!!!! Why is it always done on a Saturday night? My theory is because the powers that be don't care if people miss church because of it, but it gives people a sort of "dry run" on the new time. I think we should do the change (if we are going to do it at all) on Friday night.
I'm with Shrode. Let's keep the "spring forward" time all year round. I really like the extra hour it gives me in the evening. I can play with the kids, do some yard work, etc. Like Evan, I live on the Eastern edge of the Central time zone and it makes a big difference.
This Thursday evening I will celebrating Daylight Savings Day. I will be springing forward to Saturday at 12:01 am 3-13-09
Alert the media
actually, I live in manitoba and had taken my youth group to saskatchewan last weekend... they don't participate in DST over there simply because there is so much agriculture...

I grew up on a farm, and I don't recall ever hearing a farmer defend DST.