- The Ancient Mariner
Jonathan Acuff, writer of the excellent blog Stuff Christians Like , wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post called:
Three things Christians say about pop culture scandals
If I wanted to start a huge Christian blog I know exactly which two subjects I would write about: Calvinism and whether Christians should drink beer. I'd call it the "5 point pint" and it would be massive overnight. Thousands of people would flock to debate the merits of both TULIP and lager. I'd be a huge success and probably go on the 700 Club, which is our version of Oprah.
But if that didn't pan out, I'd probably stick to the popular method of reacting to pop culture scandals. I'd write about Lady Gaga and Tiger Woods. I'd essentially try to be the Christian edition of US Weekly. And if I did that, I'd have to write about the three things we Christians say about pop culture scandals:
1. "That would never happen to me."
I don't know the devil personally, but I have to believe he does a bit of pop locking when he hears Christians say this. We sometimes think we're infallible or perhaps invincible so when we see someone fail spectacularly we distance ourselves by immediately claiming we will never do the same thing. Jon and Kate are perfect example of that. If I had a dollar for every time a Christian claimed they would never get divorced or do that to their kids, I could buy the complete set of the Left Behind books, which totals 37 at this point. But the truth is, when we act like we're immune to an issue, we ignore it and allow it ample opportunity to sneak up on us.
2. "I can't believe they did that."
Is interrupting Taylor Swift at the MTV awards technically a sin? I'm not sure. I mean we have no Biblical evidence of David jumping on stage and grabbing the mic from Saul. "Yo, I'm going to let you finish, but Jonathan was the best warrior this season. I gotta be real!" But when Kanye West interrupted Swift's moment in the spotlight, one of the favorite reasons I heard from Christians for not forgiving him was that he had done it before. Friends told me, "He always does that, over and over again." We couldn't believe it. But the truth is, I've never committed a particular sin just one time. I wish I was "one and done," but the reality is I am often a repeat offender. The things I mess up usually happen more than once. I have bad habits, not single acts of sin. So that West jumped on stage and wrecked Swift's moment isn't surprising. Sin tends to be cyclical.
3. "Wow, they need a savior too."
This one isn't as sensational. This one doesn't make the headlines. Unfortunately, the crazy Christians are the ones who get the attention. The Westboro folks with signs splashed with hate, the militia stockpiling guns. Those grab our collective interest, but there's a new generation of Christians trying to change. A new generation who refuse to use the Christian "F word," fine. (How's life? Fine. How's your marriage? Fine.) The days where you could pretend that being a Christian meant you were perfect are numbered. Whether it's folks like Mike Foster and his "People of the Second Chance," or Craig Gross and his xxxchurch ministry, Christians are starting to admit life is messy and that grace is vital. This reaction might happen less than the other two, but it's still there.
I don't know what pop culture scandal we'll face next. I promise that Lady Gaga is going to rehab for exhaustion eventually. We tend to wear our pop princesses out. But if she does end up there, I pray number 3 will be the reaction you hear most from us Christians because I think it's the closet to the truth.
After all, pop culture icons need saviors too.
What else is there to say?
Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/6019.
And, by the way, my marriage is WAY BETTER than I deserve and a gift from God . . . So it's way better than "fine".
"new generation" . . . grumble . . .
And finally . . .
A new generation who refuse to use the Christian "F word," fine. (How's life? Fine. How's your marriage? Fine.)
FALSE
The days where you could pretend that being a Christian meant you were perfect are numbered.
DICHOTOMY
I want to make clear, despite the flurry of comments, that I agreed with and appreciated 90% of his post.
Aw, Bill, quit hinting and write the post already.
At least throw all your thoughts out on draft, save it, let it percolate, come back to it after a few days, work on it some more...and eventually it'll be ready for prime time.
I want to read it.
I'm guessing it has something to do with the new generation of Christians whining about "authenticity" or saying they can't be themselves or something. But I don't know.
Write the post. Unpopular posts get the most comments anyway ;-) Bring it.
I think I feel where Bill is going, because I share it. Of course, I will let him answer for himself, but here are my reservations about this.
The problem with sin is that all too often, in our desire to avoid or correct for one sin, we go too far in the opposite direction to another sin.
So yes, always trying to portray a image that everything is 'fine' when we really aren't, especially to our Christian brothers and sisters, can be sinful pride. But much of the modern trend towards 'total honesty', and airing all our sins, troubles, and temptations to whoever asks, can also be a perverse form of pride. A pride in being one of the 'real' Christians who admits their sins publicly (and may even let fly with a curse word now and then), not like those 'fake' and repressed Christians (who tend to be older and still go to church in suits).
I'm currently reading a modern translation of John Owen's classic works on sanctification called 'Overcoming Sin and Temptation'. I haven't gotten very far into it yet, but Owen emphasizes immediately that we need to 'be killing sin or it will be killing us'. That is the appropriate response to our sins, to kill them. We obviously need God's help to do so, and He has promised He will. However, I don't believe that the killing process always has to be a public one.
So yes, hiding and denying our sins is destructive. But so is a form of celebrating them with an appeal to a type of cheap grace. God help us avoid both.
Evan,
Now I understand why you are Bill's favorite commenter.
This is so good. I think you are exactly right. And very well-expressed
Of course, the problem with you writing this so well is that Bill is just going to say "What Evan said" and not write that post of his own anymore. :-)
If I disagree with Evan does that make me Bill's least favorite commenter?
It's not that I really disagree with Evan - I do think there is definitely sinful pride associated with the let's be "authentic" crowd.
However, there are two principle directions that the this crowd goes that I think are very healthy.
One is their backlash against Christian moralism or "older-brotherness". I think that's a good trend. The other is their tendency to equate holiness more with Matthew 25 and less with following a list of rules and dutifully pursuing Christian disciplines for the purpose of becoming holy. The Matthew 25 idea being that holiness is more about what we do than it is about what we abstain from and vote against.
I'm being brief on purpose - I'm sure the subject will be here again to expound further on.

A new generation who refuse to use the Christian "F word," fine. (How's life? Fine. How's your marriage? Fine.) The days where you could pretend that being a Christian meant you were perfect are numbered.
This makes me want to pull the trigger on a post has been percolating in me for months. I haven't had the guts to post it or the skill to write it well.
It will not be popular.