- The Ancient Mariner
We are studying Paul's letter to the Galatians in our weekly college/young adult Bible study, and last night, as we were discussing Paul's frustration with his Gentile readers over trading in the Gospel he preached to them for the Judaizers' "Jesus plus" false gospel, we saw it as illustrative of everyone's bizarre compulsion to add to the completed work of Christ.
One guy at the study said he grew up in a very legalistic independent Baptist background and went to a very legalistic Bible college. His personal church history was one in which it was very much ingrained in him to "do stuff" (and to not do stuff) to keep God from zapping him. He asked what the modern equivalent of this is, as more churches seemed less that way and more, as he put it, "normal."
My response was that most churches today still deal in legalism. We just don't think of it that way because it is happy, it speaks of grace, and it is not explicitly condemning. But in my mind, every time churches focus primarily on How To ________ or Six Steps to a Successful _________, they are dealing in legalism, because what is legalism but a gospel of works?
This new focus on our works distorts the pure joy to be found in the true Gospel. What it does, in message format for instance, is spend the majority of its time giving us stuff to do to achieve whatever, and then tacks on at the end a brief message about choosing Christ's free gift of salvation. In my estimation, this is bass ackwards. A Gospel-driven message focuses on Christ's work, on God's work on our behalf, and then moves to an exhortation or application. In most sermons in evangelical churches, the focus breaks down to 90% Helpful Tips and 10% Jesus Did it For You (if that much). But I think the reverse should be the standard.
The result in our present gospel misfocus is a practical legalism. It's just legalism with a better marketing plan. It's legalism that sells better than the old kind, because it promises practical, worldly benefits. It promises results.
And that's the real demon in this false gospel. Even as the new legalism pays lip service to grace, as it plays up the need to do this, this, and this to achieve success or victory in your work/marriage/life, it sets up success and happiness as the goal of the Christian life. Those are not bad goals, but they are not specifically Christian goals. The problem with focusing on our work with the promise that it will produce results is that we end up working for results, rather than for Christ. And when results are slow (or nonexistent), it only breeds dissatisfaction, and ultimately, despair.
An illustration: Whenever ministers cover the touchy subject of wifely submission, they inevitably try to soften Paul's instruction here by saying to husbands, "If you will love your wife as Christ loved the church, then she will be more inclined to submit to you." This makes the call to wifely submission somehow more palatable because it now hinges on a husband worthy of being submitted to.
This is true as far as it goes. Meaning, it is (usually) true that a husband who is loving, sacrificial, servant-hearted, tender, and safe will be easier for a wife to submit to than one who isn't. But what happens when a husband is not perfect? Does the wife get to opt out?
What happens when a wife is not perfectly submissive? Does the husband get to opt out of laying down his life for her?
The new legalistic approach to this situation, and others akin to it, cannot adequately answer this problem. Because it does not address sin. It is focused on results, on what "works," and therefore sets up a person to person dynamic that is, again, a distortion of the Gospel call to righteous living.
The real Gospel of grace, however, calls us to submit to each other out of reverence to God. A wife should submit to her husband not because her husband is deserving of being submitted to (because no husband really is), but because it honors God. A husband should sacrifice and serve his wife not because she deserves it, but because it is a reflection of how Christ loved us. The difference is that we do these good works -- all good works -- not because they will get us stuff or make us happy, but because they are done for and by and unto God Himself. They aren't steps to __________; they are done out of reverence for Christ.
This is because the new legalism, for all its talk of grace and love and tolerance and anti-condemnation, is just like the old legalism in that it tells us not to be satisfied with Jesus. Don't be satisfied with Jesus' work on your behalf, it suggests. That's not enough. Do more, be more, become more. Because the real goal is not satisfaction with Christ, but success in life. I can't think of anything more "anti" the testimony of the New Testament. Health, wealth, prosperity, conquering dysfunction -- the Bible just isn't really concerned with this stuff. At least, not in the ways the modern church is.
The Bible is concerned, however, with our finding joy and peace and satisfaction in Jesus Christ. The Gospel is about living being Christ and dying being gain. The new legalism says living is gain and Christ is for after death. The real Gospel just isn't sexy.
Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/4009.
Oh, and btw, I don't seem to be able to subscribe to your RSS feed, despite the fact that I can subscribe to RSS 2.0 feeds on every other site I tried. I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.5, ever heard of anyone else having this problem?
Andrew, thanks!
We're still working on the podcast thing. All the messages are recorded. Our guy who engineers them and posts them just has a lot on his plate. But we are working on getting the rest of the Jesus series up soon, as well as the current Element series. We're talking right now about ways to get the messages up quicker, the same night as the service itself, actually.
Hang in there!
I'll announce it on Thinklings when the podcasts are caught up.
Wonderful, Jared. After some difficult encounters with this mindset, I have become convinced that the walls we think exist between TBN health-n-wealth and our typical evangelical church in America aren't really there. As the iMonk likes to say, it's Jesus + the paperwork. Fits like a dream for those who buy the promises of pragmatism to deliver the goods.
The American Jesus is the no-problem-is-too-big-to-fix God, the you-can-have-it-all and you-deserve-it God (abundant life!). Not only does it displace Jesus from the center of life, it sells the alluring lie that what ails us, our families and our churches is completely within our control. Church life and practice becomes consumed with the paperwork. The Gospel of God gets lost in the shuffle. The paperwork takes over and...Jesus? He must be in there somewhere. Oh, and the similarities between old and new legalism would include the condemnatory message, only it is aimed at those who offer the grace, healing and sufficiency of your message, Jared.
I'm new to your blog but I think you have hit a homrun in this article. Our church was captured by a Purpose Driven Church Growth pastor a couple of years ago. He makes a big deal out of not being a legalist, yet we hear a lot about how we have to do thus and so in order to acheive success in our marriages, finances, etc. To drive home the point we are treated to the obligatory video clips of overcomers and how they followed the pastors advice and are now living the life God intended for them! It never occured to me that this was a form of legalism until I read your post.
This article is outstanding! I am new to this blog, but I have found this article to be great!
I do have one question though. You say that "the Gospel of grace calls us to submit to each other out of reverence to God". Is this not also a bit legalistic? After all, the Gospel of grace only gives us life, salvation, Christ. There are no demands in the Gospel, only gifts. As the old saying goes, "All God demands he provides." I am just curious about your thoughts on this.
Bob, good question. I could have fleshed that out a bit more, but I thought it might just end up being an unnecessary tangent to my main point.
What I mean by the Gospel of grace calling us to submit out of reverence to God, in the context of doing good to others (eg. the husband/wife dynamic I cited), is that we are supposed to do unto others as God has done unto us. That's grace. We don't do to others what we think they deserve or based on their worthiness, because God didn't save us based on our worthiness, but despite our not deserving it.
Does that make more sense? I just mean that grace is good news, and so our motivation in living life, working, marrying, etc. should not be "results", but glorifying God by sharing the same grace he's given us.
What these two varieties of legalism have in common is a choice between honesty and despair or deceit and outward happiness.
Legalists who are honest with themselves will see that they're not perfect, their lives don't measure up to the ideal, and good works don't always equal prosperity and happiness. Despite all their efforts, they can never attain perfection, and even when they obey God, prosperity doesn't always come. They can see the fraud perpetrated around them and it often drives them from the church.
Those, I think, are in the minority. It's usually more comfortable to lie to yourself and the world by maintaining the veneer of perfection and hiding all the things in your life that would reveal the perfect life to be an elaborate deception.
The sad thing is to watch this legalism corrode real lives.
Jared,
Thanks for that piece. I've always had problems when my pastor would preach against legalism in a sermon entitled, "4 Steps to a Better, Happier Life". Most people in my church (at that time) couldn't understand why I wasn't getting on board with the latest craze. They didn't understand that coming from a fundamentalist, legalistic Baptist background, this smack of more of "do this so God don't gitcha!". Been there...done that...got the t-shirt.
Even when my last church did the Grace Walk book, it wound up being, "Do these things and grace will abound."
Eric
Sometimes I wonder if we even know who Jesus is. Not that we can completely know. But we should know more, you know? ;)
Anyway... I've thought for a while that we look at Jesus as a means to an end rather than the end itself. Jesus isn't just a step to peace or humility or joy or whatever. He is those things completely. And so we must rest in him. Not because Jesus plus steps 2 thru 4 are ultimately a dead-end - although they are. But because we find satisfaction in him no matter what else comes.
Sentinel, I attend an Anglican church. I would give most of the credit to our priest Fr. Carlos rather than the the particular church. Fr. Carlos and our Bishop are great men of God who have been proven by fire. I'm thankful to God for them.
Brian, this Brian agrees with you very much.
Jared,
Great, great post. I'm still working through this - I am doing a guy's study at our church (teaching tonight, as a matter of fact) and I find myself wanting to check things after reading this - I want to guard against this "Jesus+" mentality, because, as you've observed, it is pervasive.
Also - yes, I'm back. I will look into the RSS feed. For various reasons I've delayed the release of Bloo 1.00 release candidate 2, and one reason is I want to get this fixed first (not that I've had any time to work on it yet :-). I'll let you know.

Amen!
It was one of the paradoxes for me that when I went to my friend's liberal Episcopal service, I found that I heard the gospel preached clearly--and by contrast realized that it was only a rare Sunday at my "conservative" DTS-trained Bible Church when I heard the simple truths of the gospel.
Thinking in terms of legalism vs. the gospel may clarify a lot of things. For instance, the reason that there are so many sermons that are clearly Scripture-based, but which afterwards leave me crushed and despairing. Things such as a sermon where the focus of the whole hour is on the fact that it's wrong to have idols before Christ, and no time focusing on the wonder of Christ and the reason we should love him. (Talk about ass backwards--one of the most comforting lines I've ever read was Lewis' assertion that we can never love a created thing too much, we can only love God too little.)